Service Level Agreements: Outsourcing Infrastructure Support

Four expensive mistakes in infrastructure outsourcing

Outsourcing the infrastructure to a managed service provider (MSP) has its benefits. Lower expenses of support, unit costs of variable resources, and decreased process duration for project supply are among the advantages generally appreciated by exchange organizations.

Yet, outsourcing infrastructure also accompanies the risk that an MSP will give you precisely what you are requesting, not what you need, and could cost more than you anticipate.

Here are five usual and expensive errors companies make while giving over infrastructure to MSPs and how to avoid them. Awareness of these risks and finding a way to mitigate them will empower you to receive the advantages of outsourcing while at the same time maintaining and even improving the business case for your outsourcing choice.

1. Not knowing your base area before going to market

Companies often resort to their outsourcing steps, feeling sure that they have a reasonable and precise understanding of their baseline impression, possibly to find surprises when somebody comes to them later to review or take an inventory manually.

You do these inventories yourself to get to the market in the right amounts, which will assist you with getting the best support costs and unit metrics related to that support. If you don’t take a look at the back end before going to market, you may wind up picking a vendor thinking you understand the cost, just to find that you weren’t right in your assumptions about the base floor area and that the costs will be higher than anticipated.

You also lose the leverage related to how you can impact your price targets to support that trail when you need to add to previously quoted amounts.

It’s in every case best to define your base area early so you can approve your business case and proceed without huge changes as you improve your process and eventually pick a supplier.

2. Neglecting past performance information

Regardless of whether you are presently operating your infrastructure or host another third party serving it and need to change, don’t tragically enter the market with just extended performance expectations. Come outfitted with current and past performance metrics from at least a half year of history.

It also provides the opportunity for a quicker transition to this baseline where there is a limited start-up period where the service level agreements themselves are liberated from penalties for support and service guarantees.

3. Neglecting to update your current service documentation

Similarly, as you should know your fundamental impression before you go to the market, you should also update your documentation for all services that are running before proceeding. Reviewing the whole set of services performed today, checking on them, and getting them verified is a major step towards defining the proper scope of the expense of your service. It helps in updating service level agreements too.

Take time to recognize what other errands or services you want to add to your scope of outsourced services that you don’t would today or like to do any other way. It isn’t always vital or even practical to list all possible day-to-day assignments that you want your provider to perform. While documenting your scope of outsourced services, try to use keywords, for example, “counting, yet not limited to, the following” or “an example of the operations defined in this responsibility incorporates.” Getting the scope of services on paper ahead of time is basic since all that you miss will be an open door for your provider to present a change request later on.

4. Allowing MSPs to control the story during the evaluation process

You can limit the greater part of the risks related to scope creep or conflicting proposal responses by managing and controlling the story around the scope of the service and how you are providing cost/support to the defined/friendly defined metrics in that service.

By expressing what these metrics are and being able to assemble consistency to anticipate your demand, you can enter the market how you are looking for specific price points against the number of your metrics and your current environment. Providing all possible vendors thorough and explicit requests for offer prerequisites, baseline metrics, and pre-assessed demand will allow you to restore easy proposals after which you can compare apple-with-apple between providers. This will help you settle on more informed choices about who is best for you, regarding service commitment, service level agreement, but also as far as service value.

With regards to fundamental managed services, it is significant to begin your journey with this sort of planning before you go to the market when you need to avoid costly missteps after reward and service arrangements. The facts demonstrate that readiness is the best type of counteraction. For this situation, planning will assist you with diminishing the risks related to outsourced network infrastructure management services.

Advertisement